Evaluating Profitability of Red Mud Based Geopolymer Brick by Using The Cost Benefit Analysis Framework
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Published
Dec 28, 2024
Abstract
Red mud is a byproduct of Bayer process in alumina refinery which become a major problem in the industry. The waste causes alumina refinery to spend significant amount of capital and operational expenditure to handle and was historically have caused environmental damage to its surrounding environment. To fill the research gap, this work is design to define the cost and benefit of producing geopolymer brick based of red mud by using the Cost Benefit Analysis framework. The cost is determined by the capital and operational expenditure of constructing a geopolymer brick factory and benefit was determine by the amount of cashflow the factory would generate. The work is done in PT CBJ, a new alumina refinery based at Mempawah, West Kalimantan, Indonesia which in the future will produces approximately 30 million tons of red mud. The research showed the proposed project will potentially generating a positive present value cashflow worth $126,159,703.58 from processing an annual 1.5 million ton of red mud and $901,318.85 from 6,892 ton of red mud annual processing. However, the BCR only shows 1.02 and 1.03 ratio from both scenarios. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis shows some variables are way too sensitive after price changes which conclude the project is risky to execute.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak Cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Ranah Research.
References
Bouchoucha, M., et al. (2019). Impact of red mud disposal on marine life near Cassigaigne Canyon. Journal of Marine Environmental Research.
Cui, W., et al. (2023). Environmental impacts and management strategies for red mud. Environmental Pollution.
Cui, W., et al. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of red mud utilization from 2001–2023. Journal of Cleaner Production.
Das, D., et al. (2020). Economic and mechanical analysis of geopolymer bricks: A sustainable alternative to traditional fired bricks. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies.
Deng, H., et al. (2019). Heavy metal migration and toxicity in humans and the environment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.
Henly, N., & Barbier, E. B. (2009). Pricing nature: Cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Irfan-ul-Hassan, M., et al. (2024). Red mud and slag-based geopolymer bricks: Composition, compressive strength, and economic feasibility. Construction and Building Materials.
Kabore, S. A., et al. (2024). Cost-Benefit Analysis of soil restoration in Gourga Forest: Economic and environmental implications. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
Kim, S., et al. (2023). Marine contamination from red mud in South Korea's benthic environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin.
Milacic, R., et al. (2012). Hexavalent chromium contamination due to red mud leaks: Case of Hungary. Journal of Hazardous Materials.
Ozden, A., et al. (2019). Toxic and radioactive element analysis in red mud storage: Cases from Turkey. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity.
Ujaczki, É., et al. (2015). Long-term environmental damage due to improper red mud storage. Journal of Environmental Management.
Wang, X., et al. (2022). Applications of red mud in construction materials and metal extraction. Journal of Materials Science.
Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2021). Environmental risks of red mud and strategies for sustainable management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
Youssef, A. M., et al. (2020). Environmental and energy efficiency of geopolymer bricks: Comprehensive economic analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production.