Penerapan Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian dan Ancaman Terhadap Kebebasan Berbicara

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dini Wulandari

Abstract

Freedom of speech is a human right guaranteed by the Indonesian constitution, as stated in Article 28E paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Even though it is legally recognized, the implementation of freedom of speech in Indonesia is not free from limitations, especially when it relates to speech. hatred that can damage public order and the reputation of others. As a country of law, Indonesia regulates freedom of expression through various regulations, but this law is often misused to limit critical voices against the government or certain policies. This practice generates controversy, threatens democracy, and hinders the development of healthy public discourse. Cases involving individuals and groups, such as Basuki Tjahaja Purnama and the Saracen group, illustrate the tension between freedom of speech and the protection of individual rights. These restrictions on freedom of speech also have the potential to damage pluralism and freedom of expression, as well as increase the imbalance of power between the government and society. This research examines the implications of restrictions on free speech in Indonesia, highlights existing legal challenges, and urges the need for reform to ensure free speech is maintained as a strong pillar of democracy.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Wulandari, D. (2025) “Penerapan Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian dan Ancaman Terhadap Kebebasan Berbicara”, Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(3), pp. 1994-2001. doi: 10.38035/rrj.v7i3.1356.

References

Amalah, Arfa Shafiyatul. Et. Al. “Etika Kebebasan Berbicara VS Kebencian Dan Diskriminasi”. Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains dan Sosial Humanioral. Vol. 1. No. 2 (2024). Hlm. 6.
Ansorim, Lutfi. “Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Prespektif Hukum Progresif”. Jurnal Yuridis. Vol. 4. No. 2 (2018), hlm. 148.
Bhat, P. Ishwara. Idea and Methods of Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Hermes. “Hoaxes and Hate Speech Stir Trouble”. The Straits Times (29 Oct 2017). Tersedia pada http://bit.ly/hoaxes-and-hate, diakses pada tanggal 26 November 2024.
Hutchinson, Terry. Researching and Writing in Law. Ed. 4. Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters, 2018.
Irawan. “Hate Speech di Indonesia: Bahaya dan Solusi”. Jurnal Dakwah dan Pengembangan Sosial Kemanusiaan. Vol. 9. No. 1 (2018). Hlm. 1.
M Iqbal. “Kontroveksi Ahok Soal Al Maidah Ayat 51”. DetikNews (07 Oktober 2016). Tersedia pada https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3315674/kontroversi-ahok-soal-al-maidah-ayat-51. Diakses pada tanggal 8 Desember 2024.
Oktaviani,Sri. “Konstitusi dan Kebebasan Berpendapat Di Indonesia: Analisis Keterbatasan dan Perlindungan”. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Manajemen. Vol. 2. No. 7 (2024). Hlm. 1.
Sadiawati, Diani. Et. Al. “Polemik UU ITE, Kontroversi Pelaksasanaan dan Pembatasan Kebebaan Pendapat Menciptakan Paham Demokrasi di Indonesia”. Quantum Juris: Jurnal Hukum Modern. Vol 06. No. 1 (2024). Hlm. 54.
Santoso, Agus. Hukum, Moral Dan Keadilan: Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: kencana Prenada Media Group, 2012.