Membangun Layanan Publik yang Partisipatif: Studi Kasus SIPRAJA melalui Perspektif New Public Governance
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Published
Mar 10, 2025
Abstract
SIPRAJA (Sistem Pelayanan Rakyat Sidoarjo), developed by the Sidoarjo district government, emerged as a digital solution designed to simplify bureaucratic processes and increase citizen engagement. This study analyzes SIPRAJA through a New Public Governance (NPG) perspective, emphasizing a collaborative and citizen-centered approach to promoting inclusive and responsive governance. By integrating various stakeholders, including government agencies, private actors, and communities, SIPRAJA reflects NPG principles that prioritize co-creation and shared responsibility. This article begins by discussing challenges in traditional public administration that impede efficient service delivery. It then introduces SIPRAJA as an innovative response and explores its conceptual basis within the NPG theoretical framework. Through qualitative analysis and secondary data, this study highlights the impact of SIPRAJA in reducing administrative burden, increasing transparency, and building trust among stakeholders. However, challenges such as digital literacy gaps and infrastructure limitations were also identified, emphasizing the need for adaptive strategies. Findings show that SIPRAJA significantly contributed to the transformation of Sidoarjo's public services by promoting participatory governance, improving service accessibility and conforming to global standards for e-governance. Recommendations include increasing digital inclusion, strengthening public-private partnerships and adopting continuous monitoring mechanisms to ensure ongoing success. This research contributes to the discourse on public sector innovation by showing how NPG principles can be operationalized through technology-based initiatives such as SIPRAJA.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak Cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Ranah Research.
References
Borins, S. (2014). The Persistence of Innovation in Government: A Guide for Innovative Public Servants. Brookings Institution Press. https://doi.org/10.7864/j.ctt6wpdmk
Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2009). Public management and governance (2nd ed.). Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877258
Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2012). Evaluating the quality of public governance: Indicators, models and methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(3), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312455992
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2009). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. M.E. Sharpe.
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296194.001.0001
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press.
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
Heinrich, C. J. (2007). Governance and public service delivery: An overview of the literature. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00656.x
Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684
Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK: The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
Pemerintah Kabupaten Sidoarjo. (2023). Sistem Pelayanan Rakyat Sidoarjo (SIPRAJA).
Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2016). Comparative governance: Rediscovering the functional dimension of governing. Cambridge University Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586
Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (Eds.). (2016). Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance. Cambridge University Press.