Do Traditional Imaging Predictors Still Matter? A Systematic Review on Laser Efficiency and Stone-Free Outcomes in the Era of Advanced Lithotripsy
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Published
Jun 18, 2026
Abstract
Endoscopic laser lithotripsy has become the standard treatment for urinary stones, yet preoperative imaging parameters that predict laser efficiency and stone-free outcomes remain incompletely characterized. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on current imaging-based predictors of laser efficiency and stone-free outcomes in endoscopic laser lithotripsy, with the goal of informing precision surgical planning and future predictive modeling. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We screened studies evaluating adult patients (≥18 years) with urinary stones undergoing endoscopic laser lithotripsy with preoperative imaging assessment and reported relationships between imaging parameters and treatment outcomes. Data extraction included patient characteristics, imaging parameters, laser technology, efficiency metrics, stone-free outcomes, and statistical relationships. One hundred ten studies comprising 23,847 patients met inclusion criteria. Stone density >1000 HU predicted significantly lower single-session stone-free rates (40% vs 95%, p=0.01) and longer operative time (75±15 vs 55±13 minutes, p<0.01) for stones >2 cm. Stone size >20 mm reduced stone-free rates to 68% versus 100% for stones ≤20 mm, with first-procedure success of only 25.0% for bilateral total diameter >30 mm. Lower pole location independently predicted reduced stone-free rates (OR 0.523, p<0.001), while stone relocation improved 3-month stone-free rates from 84.4% to 97.8% (p=0.026). Higher BMI unexpectedly predicted improved stone-free rates (OR 1.17, p=0.022). Thulium fiber laser demonstrated shorter lasing time (7.4±1.8 vs 14.8±1.5 minutes, p=0.011) and comparable stone-free rates to Ho: YAG. The SMASH score (HU × size/100) with cut-off of 15 distinguished RIRS success rates (82% vs 61%, p=0.03). Flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) achieved 94.7-97.5% stone-free rates. Stone imaging characteristics helped predict complex surgical procedures and outcomes of endoscopic lithotripsy․ Imaging methods differed in their ability to predict procedural difficulty‚ with density being most predictive for large stones․ The anatomical location and stone burden helped predict procedural feasibility and stone clearance․ Support is provided for transitioning from descriptive imaging to predictive imaging-based surgical planning and the potential for imaging biomarkers and technology-dependent parameters to individualize surgery and optimize laser parameters․Stone density >1000 HU, size >20 mm, and lower pole location are validated predictors of reduced laser efficiency and stone-free outcomes. Composite scores such as Stone Management According to Size-Hardness (SMASH) score‚ show that radiological factors can be integrated into clinical decision-making for kidney stone management․ These results will allow for the next steps towards the use of artificial intelligence–driven predictive models for personalized endoscopic stone surgery and urinary stone treatment planning․
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak Cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Ranah Research.
References
Abushnaf, A., Garta, I., Omran, A. bin, & Aboshnaf, A. (2023). Efficacy and safety of holmium laser lithotripsy for renal calculi in retrograde intrarenal surgery: A comparative study in Libyan patients. Libyan International Medical University Journal. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777118
Aksoy, S., Çakıroğlu, B., Taş, T., & Yurdaışık, I. (2022). The effects of stone density on surgical outcomes of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery. British Journal of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220229
Chai, C., Inoue, T., Somani, B., et al. (2024). Comparing thulium fiber versus high power holmium laser in bilateral same sitting retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones: Results from a multicenter study. Investigative and Clinical Urology. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20240185
Chandramohan, V., Swamy, S., Ramakrishna, P., et al. (2023). Ureteroscopic lithotripsy by thulium fiber laser versus holmium laser: A single-center prospective randomized study. Urology Annals. https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_115_22
Gauhar, V., Giulioni, C., Falsetti, F., et al. (2025). Lasing strategy and its influence on 30-day operative outcomes in flexible ureteroscopy with FANS: Inferences from a real-world perspective multicenter study by EAU-Endourology and AUSET. World Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-06012-6
Gauhar, V., Traxer, O., Castellani, D., et al. (2023). A feasibility study on clinical utility, efficacy and limitations of two types of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.032
Gauhar, V., Traxer, O., Fong, K., et al. (2024). Comparing thulium fiber versus high-power holmium laser lithotripsy combined with the flexible and navigable suction access sheath in flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone disease: A propensity score matched analysis by the Global FANS Collaborative Group. Journal of Endourology. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0653
Huang, R., Chen, J.-C., Zhou, Y.-Q., et al. (2024). Relocation of lower pole renal stones helps improve the stone-free rate during flexible ureteroscopy with a low complication rate. World Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04703-6
Jahrreiss, V., Gauhar, V., Traxer, O., et al. (2024). Influence of pre-stenting on flexible and navigable suction (FANS) access sheath outcomes: Results of a prospective multicentre study by the EAU Section of Endourology and the Global FANS Collaborative Group. Central European Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.0197
Kozubaev, B., Demirdogen, S. O., Aksakalli, T., et al. (2025). Comparison of thulium fiber laser and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy in retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stone treatment: A randomized prospective study. Actas Urológicas Españolas. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501808
Meller, A., Traxer, O., Freschi, G., et al. (2025). Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones <20 mm with low-power holmium laser: Is basket extraction still needed or is dusting enough? A prospective study with CT-based outcome assessment. Journal of Endourology. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251390878
Okçelik, S., Kurul, N. O., Kızıloz, H., et al. (2021). Factors affecting success of semi-rigid ureterorenoscopy in proximal ureter stone treatment. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan: JCPSP. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2021.01.65
Ong, C. S. H., Somani, B., Chew, B., et al. (2024). Multicentre study comparing outcomes of RIRS using traditional suction ureteral access sheath (SUAS) and flexible and navigable suction UAS (FANS). Journal of Clinical Urology. https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158241272717
Pathak, N., Gowda, N., Coelho, V., et al. (2023). Prospective randomized controlled trial to compare dusting vs fragmentation using thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Journal of Endourology. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2023.0167
Perri, D., Besana, U., Berti, L., et al. (2023). PD28-11 A proposed mathematical model to help preoperative planning between RIRS and Minipercutaneus for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using holmium:YAG laser (CYBER HO): The stone management according to size-hardness (SMASH) score. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003313.11
Perri, D., Mazzoleni, F., Besana, U., et al. (2024). A proposed mathematical model to help preoperative planning between RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using holmium:YAG laser (Cyber Ho): The stone management according to size-hardness (SMASH) score. Urolithiasis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01536-9
Singh, A., Jain, A. R., Ganpule, A., et al. (2017). Prospective randomized study of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy using high-frequency stone dusting versus a low-frequency stone breaking protocol for the treatment of renal stones larger than 2 cm: PD21-07. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.1045
Tu, W., Zhang, X.-L., Wang, J., et al. (2023). Influence of stone load on the outcome of same-session flexible ureteroscopy for bilateral upper urinary tract stones: A multicenter retrospective study. Frontiers in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1163371
Wang, M., Shao, Q., Zhu, X.-D., et al. (2021). Efficiency and clinical outcomes of Moses technology with flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for treatment of renal calculus. Urologia Internationalis. https://doi.org/10.1159/000512054