Fragmentasi Permukiman dan Kualitas Hidup di Global Selatan: Bukti dari Kecamatan Tugu, Kota Semarang
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Published
Jul 9, 2026
Abstract
Residential fragmentation has emerged as a critical challenge in rapidly urbanizing regions of the Global South, reflecting spatial and social segregation driven by disparities in socioeconomic status, access to infrastructure, and urban services. This study investigates the level of residential fragmentation in Tugu District, Semarang City, and examines its impact on the quality of life of residents in three residential types: gated communities (Graha Padma and Green Oase Homy Residence), formal housing (Jerakah and Tugurejo), and informal housing (Tugurejo, Randu Garut, and Mangunharjo). Using a mixed-methods approach, the study integrates quantitative and qualitative survey data from interviews, field observations, and secondary data. Descriptive statistical analysis is used to assess variations in quality of life indicators, while a SWOT analysis is applied to formulate strategic interventions. Findings reveal significant gaps in infrastructure access, environmental quality, security, and social interaction, where higher levels of fragmentation are associated with lower social cohesion and well-being; informal housing shows the highest vulnerability, while gated communities show better service provision but weaker social integration. Based on the findings, this study recommends specific strategies to enhance inclusivity, improve service accessibility, and social integration in fragmented residential areas. The proposed priority intervention is the integration of drainage systems across residential fragments, as issues of drainage, sanitation, and flood/tidal flood vulnerability are critical points that most influence residents' quality of life. Thus, in addition to enriching theories of urban fragmentation and resilience, this study offers practical policy directions for governments to reduce disparities in basic services while strengthening physical and social connectivity between residential types in secondary cities of the Global South.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak Cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Ranah Research.
References
Banzhaf, E., et al. (2014). A Conceptual Framework for Integrated Analysis of Environmental Quality and Quality of Life. Ecological Indicators, 45, 664–668.
Blakely, E. J., & Snyder, M. G. (1998). Separate Places: Crime and Security in Gated Communities. In M. Felson & R. B. Peiser (Eds.), Reducing Crime Through Real Estate Development (pp. 53–70).
Bucheli, J. F. (2022). The Influence of the Fragmented City on Wellbeing. Journal of Urban Management, 11, 450–466.
Caldeira, T. P. R. (2000). City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo. University of California Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Firman, T. (2004). New Town Development in Jakarta Metropolitan Region. Habitat International, 28, 349–368.
Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition. Routledge.
Hadijah. (2020). Pengaruh Urbanisasi Terhadap Penurunan Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 8, 290–306.
Harris, R. (2019). Modes of Informal Urban Development: A Global Phenomenon. Journal of Planning Literature.
Jimmy, E. N., & Martinez, J. (2020). Spatial Patterns of Residential Fragmentation and Quality of Life in Nairobi City, Kenya, 1493–1517.
Kementerian Dalam Negeri RI. (2024). City Development Planning and Project Management Capacity Development Kota Semarang.
Kurniati, D., & Kurniawati, W. (2021). Bentuk Hunian Informal: Studi Kasus Kampung Melayu Semarang. 7, 46–55.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Blackwell.
Lestari, T. I., & Yunita, L. (2020). The Implementation of SWOT Analysis As a Basis For Determining Marketing Strategies, 10, 25–29.
Marans, R. W., & Stimson, R. J. (Eds.). (2011). Investigating Quality of Urban Life: Theory, Methods, and Empirical Research. Springer.
Pacione, M. (2003). Urban Environmental Quality and Human Wellbeing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19–30.
Sabatini, F., & Salcedo, R. (2007). Gated Communities and the Poor in Santiago, Chile. Housing Policy Debate, 18, 577–606.
Sassen, S. (2001). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Supriyadi. (2021). Konstruksi Gated Community: Perubahan dan Tantangan Masyarakat Perumahan (Studi di Perumahan BSB, Mijen Kota Semarang).
Terzi, F. (2019). Residential Satisfaction in Formal and Informal Neighborhoods. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research.
WHO. (2012). WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life. World Health Organization.