Inovasi Kelembagaan Musyawarah Dusun sebagai Katalis Partisipasi Substantif: Pelajaran dari Desa Bulumeduro dan Desa Bulujowo, Kecamatan Bancar, Kabupaten Tuban
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Published
Jul 22, 2026
Abstract
This study examines institutional innovation through the Hamlet Deliberation Forum (Musyawarah Dusun/Musdus) as a mechanism for improving the quality of community participation in village development planning meetings (Musrenbangdes). Using a qualitative comparative case study approach in Bulumeduro Village (implementing Musdus; ±1,164 inhabitants) and Bulujowo Village (without Musdus; ±5,253 inhabitants) in Bancar District, Tuban Regency, this study analyzes how institutional forum design influences inclusiveness, the quality of deliberation, and the influence of participation on policy. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 20 key informants, observations of Musdes/Musrenbangdes forums, and document analysis of the Village Government Work Plan (RKPDes), meeting minutes, official records, and attendance lists. The findings show that Musdus in Bulumeduro simultaneously increased neighborhood-unit (RT) representation (from 13% to 50%), shifted communication patterns from one-way communication to two-way deliberation, and established a feedback mechanism that created a self-reinforcing cycle of trust. Comparison with Bulujowo, which applies a single-forum model, reveals a three-level difference in participation typology (Pretty: Consultative vs. Interactive Participation) and a two-rung difference on Arnstein's Ladder of Citizen Participation (Consultation vs. Partnership). This study contributes to the literature on participatory institutional design by demonstrating that improvements in participation quality can begin with local institutional innovation without waiting for changes in national regulations, and that differences in population size create the need for structurally different forum designs.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak Cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di Ranah Research.
References
Am, T. A. (2024). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa di Desa Gedungan Kecamatan Batuan Kabupaten Sumenep. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 1(1).
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969.
Fitri, F., Yudarti, Y., Hasyim, S., Sani, K. R., & Fitriani, F. (2025). Analisis Kualitas Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan (Musrenbang) Desa Barugae. Journal of Innovative and Creativity (Joecy), 5(2), 16797–16808.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75.
Geovany, D. H., Rachmawati, I., & Sampurna, R. H. (2025). Community participation in the development plan of Mande Village, Mande District, Cianjur Regency. LAW & PASS International Journal of Law Public Administration and Social Studies, 2(4), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.47353/lawpass.v2i4.52
Halling, A., & Bækgaard, M. (2024). Administrative burden in citizen-state interactions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(2), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad023
Indriani, C., Asang, S., & Hans, A. (2021). Tingkat partisipasi masyarakat dalam perencanaan pembangunan di Desa Pali Kecamatan Bittuang Kabupaten Tana Toraja. Development Policy and Management Review (DPMR), 1(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.61731/dpmr.vi.18597
Kasim, S. S., Sarmadan, S., Supiyah, R., & Damsid, D. (2022). Model Perencanaan Pembangunan Berbasis Kalo Sara dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan Desa. ETNOREFLIKA: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya, 11(1), 106-119. https://doi.org/10.33772/etnoreflika.v11i1.1476
Kayupa, O. O., Guampe, F. A., Hengkeng, J., & Balo, M. J. (2025). Tantangan dan peluang implementasi perencanaan pembangunan partisipatif desa-desa di Indonesia. Studi Ilmu Manajemen dan Organisasi, 6(1), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.35912/simo.v6i1.3483
Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 114 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pembangunan Desa. Kemendagri.
Kementerian Desa dan Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal. (2024). Data Indeks Desa Membangun tahun 2024 [Dataset]. Satu Data Indonesia. https://data.go.id/dataset/dataset/data-indeks-desa-membangun-tahun-2024
Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing development: Does participation work? World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8256-1
Meier, K. J., & Bohte, J. (2003). Span of Control and Public Organizations: Implementing Luther Gulick's Research Design. Public Administration Review, 63(1), 61–70.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moynihan, D. P., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009
Naisoko, F., & Bait, P. M. (2024). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam perencanaan pembangunan desa di Desa Subun Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 3(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v3i2.1278
Nielsen, V. L., & Nielsen, H. Ø. (2024). Perceived burdens of interacting with public authorities: How does it influence citizens’ state-encounter behavior? International Journal of Social Welfare, 33(4), 858–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12663
Noviar, I., & Priyanti, E. (2023). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa di Desa Warung Bambu Kecamatan Karawang Timur Kabupaten Karawang. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 8(3), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.36982/jpg.v8i3.2929
Pickvance, C. G. (2001). Four varieties of comparative analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16(1), 7–28.
Pretty, J. N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23(8), 1247–1263.
Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Sekretariat Negara.
Schwoerer, K. (2025). The UX of bureaucracy: Mapping user engagement to citizen experiences of administrative burdens. International Review of Public Administration, 30(3), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2025.2535772
Setiawan, A., Suwaryo, U., & Rahmatunnisa, M. (2020). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam perencanaan pembangunan desa di Kabupaten Bandung (Studi kasus di Desa Margamukti, Desa Sayati, Desa Ciburial dan Desa Nanjung Kabupaten Bandung). Jurnal Academia Praja, 3(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.36859/jap.v3i2.197
Tjilen, A. P., & Moento, P. A. (2023). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan di Kampung Wapeko, Distrik Animha, Kabupaten Merauke. NeoRespublica: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4(2), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.52423/neoresjurnal.v4i2.84
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zhu, J., Han, Y., & Chen, Z. (2024). The effect of administrative burden perception on citizen participation: A barrier or a spur? Public Performance & Management Review, 47(5), 1138–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2354304