Digitalisasi Sebagai Formulasi Transisi Menuju Transparasi Perpajakan

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Yunus Darmono
Amir Junaidi
Ismiyanto Ismiyanto

Abstract

This research answers the problem formulation of the urgency of tax digitalization as a transition formulation towards tax transparency and determines the various obstacles in implementing tax digitalization as a transition formulation towards tax transparency. Transparency is one component of good governance, including in the field of taxation. In order to realize aspects of transparency, the government issued a tax digitalization policy. The hope is that digitalization of taxation can improve the weaknesses of conventional taxation and be able to formulate a transition or change towards transparent taxation. This sociolegal research uses a qualitative and descriptive approach with the main aim of searching for data on the implementation of tax digitalization as well as at the regional level within the scope of its implementation by employees of the Primary and Middle Tax Offices in the City of Surakarta. The results of the research are the urgency of digitizing taxation as a transition formulation towards tax transparency as a response to electronic and e-Government based government systems as well as increasing ease of tax access. Meanwhile, various obstacles in implementing tax digitalization as a formulation of the transition towards tax transparency include the transition from conventional taxation to digital taxation as well as budget problems and system maintenance.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Darmono, Y., Junaidi, A. and Ismiyanto, I. (2024) “Digitalisasi Sebagai Formulasi Transisi Menuju Transparasi Perpajakan”, Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(1), pp. 272-278. doi: 10.38035/rrj.v7i1.1227.

References

Aini, Nadia Qurrota, Nunung Nurhayati, “Pengaruh Kebijakan Insentif Pajak Penghasilan bagi UMKM dan Digitalisasi Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak”, Makalah yang dipresentasikan pada Bandung Conference Series: Accountancy, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2022: 341-346.
Avineri, Shlomo, 1972, Hegel's Theory of the Modern State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hegel, Georg W. F., 1976, Philosophy of Right, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Istianto, Bambang, 2011, Demokratisasi Birokrasi, Cetakan I, Mitra Wacana Media, Jakarta.
Jackson, M. W., "Bureaucracy in Hegel's Political Theory," Administration and Society, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1986: 139-157.
Lounsbury, Michael, Edward J. Carberry, “From King to Court Jester? Weber’s Fall from Grace in Organization Theory,” Organization Studies, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2005: 501-525.
Miles, Huberman, 2005, Analisis dan Kualitatif (Terjemahan), UI Press, Jakarta.
Nurbaiti, Ellyn, Heru Susilo, Rosalita Rachma Agusti, “Pengaruh Implementasi Sistem Elektronik Bagi Wajib Pajak Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Administrasi Perpajakan (Studi pada Wajib Pajak terdaftar di KPP Pratama Malang Utara)”, Jurnal Perpajakan JEJAK, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2016.
Online Pajak.com, “5 Aplikasi Pajak Tahun 2022 dan Keuntungan Menggunakannya”, https://www.online-pajak.com/tentang-efiling/aplikasi-pajak-tahun-2021, diakses pada Rabu 22 Mei 2024.
Pandiangan, Liberti, 2005, Modernisasi dan Reformasi Pelayanan Perpajakan, PT. Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.
Shaw, Carl K. Y., “Hegel's Theory of Modern Bureaucracy”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 86, No. 2, 1992: 381-389.
Shedel, James, “To Be a Rechtsstaat: Theory and Reality in Austria, 1848-1865,” Journals Demokratie und Geschichte, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2019: 183-194.