Menavigasi Hibriditas: Tantangan dan Peluang Kolaborasi Publik-Privat dalam Transformasi Layanan Kesehatan Indonesia

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rulinawaty Rulinawaty
Lukman Samboteng
Andriyansah Andriyansah
M. Rachmat Kasmad
Alwi Alwi
Mutmainnah Basit

Abstract

Hybrid organizations that combine elements of the public and private sectors are growing in healthcare in Indonesia, but their impact and management are still debated. This study aims to identify and analyze the dimensions of hybridity and its impact in operational practices. A qualitative case study method was used with a multidimensional analysis of three hybrid healthcare organizations in Indonesia, involving in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis. The results showed that organizational hybridity includes variations in legal form, ownership, funding, activities, strategic orientation, organizational culture, and governance, which simultaneously create positive impacts such as innovation, efficiency, and improved service quality, as well as negative effects such as internal value conflicts, unfair cross-subsidies, and public accountability challenges. This study confirms the importance of strategic management and pragmatic approaches in understanding and managing hybrid organizations, and makes significant theoretical and practical contributions to health sector policy development. Further research is recommended to explore optimal governance strategies in the context of other hybrid organizations in Indonesia.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Rulinawaty, R., Samboteng, L., Andriyansah, A., Kasmad, M. R., Alwi, A. and Basit, M. (2024) “Menavigasi Hibriditas: Tantangan dan Peluang Kolaborasi Publik-Privat dalam Transformasi Layanan Kesehatan Indonesia”, Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 6(6), pp. 3032-3046. doi: 10.38035/rrj.v6i6.1594.

References

Billis, D. (2010). Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230364394
Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. Jossey-Bass.
Brandsen, T., & Karré, P. M. (2020). Hybrid organizations: No cause for concern?. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(9), 735-742. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1729189
Brandsen, T., Van de Donk, W., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9-10), 749-765. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-200067320
Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.). (2023). Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003196454
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Evers, A., Laville, J.-L., Borzaga, C., Defourny, J., Lewis, J., Nyssens, M., & Pestoff, V. (2021). The emergence of social enterprise. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203164679
Frissen, P. (2021). Politics, governance, and technology: A postmodern narrative on the virtual state. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906269
Jacobs, J. (1992). Systems of survival: A dialogue on the moral foundations of commerce and politics. Vintage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2021). Naturalistic inquiry (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mouwen, K., & Bijsterveld, K. (2022). Hybrid organizations and their identities: Between market, public, and third sector. Organization Studies, 43(3), 485-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406211019329
Perry, J. L., & Rainey, H. G. (1988). The public-private distinction in organization theory: A critique and research strategy. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 182-201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306858
Rainey, H. G., & Chun, Y. H. (2022). Public and private management compared. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.141
Simon, H. A. (2022). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Van de Donk, W. (2001). The societal triangle: State, market, and community. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(2), 273-296. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504
Van Thiel, S. (2022). Public administration and hybrid governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003101830
Weintraub, J. (2007). Public/private: A conceptual map. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945537
Yin, R. K. (2024). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.